The Convergence of Poverty, Wealth, and Tokenism
The gap between poverty and wealth can be exacerbated by the introduction of tokenism, potentially leading to a caste system with significant consequences for those in the art and creative fields. As capitalism faces challenges, government bodies and corporations are exploring new systems, one of which includes a credit system. This involves assigning a numerical value to individuals, impacting their access to services and products.
Subscription-based models, like Adobe’s shift from owned software to monthly fees, exemplify this trend. Such systems mirror the concept of credits and are appealing to governments and corporations for managing resources and controlling populations. This structured approach makes it easier to dictate behaviour across various sectors, including education, healthcare, and finance. Access to more services becomes contingent on possessing more credits, but the financial ability to acquire these credits becomes the barrier.
The Art Market Under a Credit System
In the art and creative market, which already has its own set of challenges, the introduction of a credit system could have far-reaching implications. The art market is a prime example of a system dominated by a privileged few. Auction houses, for instance, become speculative platforms where only select artists gain visibility, while many others struggle to make their mark.
Financial grants and governmental support are crucial in sustaining this market. Plugging a credit system into this framework means that public bodies could control not just financial support but also what cultural expressions gain prominence. This centralised control could severely limit the autonomy of artists and creatives, constraining their freedom to explore and innovate.
Navigating the Future: Decentralisation and Community
Despite resistance to technology, artists must acknowledge its impact and look for ways to incorporate it into their practice. Building decentralised or semi-decentralised communities, much like the Bitcoin model, can offer a way forward. Such communities can develop their own rules and transact independently, minimising governmental interference and maintaining creative freedom.
To thrive in this evolving landscape, artists should consider building networks that support decentralised practices, fostering cooperation and mutual support. By seeking alternative funding models, such as Patreon and stakeholder collaborations, the art community can secure the resources needed while preserving artistic freedom and diversity.
Call to Action
Explore how you can contribute to a decentralised and autonomous creative community. Join MCJ Studio and be part of the dialogue shaping the future of art and creativity.
Leave a Reply