Poltergeist Thinking and the Real Barriers to Skill
Artists, founders, and directors programmed for creative solution-based thinking confront a paradox: the world repeats that mindset overrules circumstance, yet still, the ground beneath our work—skills, networks, labor—feels unyielding. Many leaders grip to myths about their capacities or “syndromes,” reciting internal narratives that filter experience through superstition or misdiagnosed lack. It becomes a closed loop: belief in the barrier becomes the barrier, and our work stalls while a record plays the song we thought was destiny. Here, the cultural echo chamber of “you’re not enough” meets its equal and opposite: the ghost myths that prevent reality-checks on what is, in fact, missing. Often, this is not some inherited wound or spectral problem—it is skills, not spirits.
To engage in systems-level change we need to name the forces at play, not indulge haunting explanations. The real block to progress is often the inability to stand far enough outside oneself to see the matrix of skills, opportunities, and stories we inhabit. If we accept comforting lies, whether psychological or socio-economic, then transformation remains unavailable, and the status quo—of internal and external power—goes unchallenged.
Self-Observation: Not a Circus Trick, Nor a Shame Ritual
Self-awareness, for the international creative class, demands combat against two lazy alternatives: self-flagellation for its own sake and avoidance dressed as “authenticity.” The language of comparison muddies this process; evaluating yourself only by evidence that emerges from circumstance or from what others reflect back is a distraction. Every stakeholder, peer, or audience meets a different “slice” of us. Those are not truths; they are user-interfaces.
True observation works differently. It is not a Red Bull for your ego. It is not a performance of humility or pain. It is neither fatalistic resignation nor narrative hoarding—where struggle and suffering are weaponized for later artistic laurels or institutional grants. The paradigm shift, for leaders and artists building infrastructure, is this: narratives about personal struggle do not make you more valuable, and marinating in adversity does not improve your critical or creative output. The system does not reward tragedy; it rewards development, leverage, and sovereignty over skill.
Ghostbusting: Challenging Narrative with Discipline
If you want something actionable: embrace Ghostbuster energy—not chasing phantoms but disbelieving the spooky stories your own subconscious manufactures about inevitable failure or invincible lack. This work depends on discipline, a term so misused it now produces nausea, but one with teeth when you return it to practice.
For founders and directors, discipline is not a regimen of self-punishment. It is sustained, repeated, rigorous study of skill development, separated from confessional performance or fixed personality. “I’m lazy” is not a diagnosis; it is a dodge. “I came from little and so my art must suffer,” or, “I am too soft to lead”—these are fictions. Self-study means mapping where your capacity stands now, but more critically, where growth is frictional, slow, and thus most necessary.
Skill acquisition is not a referendum on your value, emotional landscape, or ultimate worth. It is a tool for leverage and for building the systems and organizations that shift culture. Discipline becomes an act of refusal: the refusal to let myth replace method, or inherited narrative replace deliberate action.
Tool: A Framework for Self-Observation Without Mythology
Construct your own “Ghostbuster Audit”:
1. Sit with a blank page. List the skills required for your next breakthrough—not “who you are,” but what you need to do.
2. For each, write the story you tell yourself about that skill (“I am not technical,” “I lack patience,” etc.).
3. Next to each story, write: “Is this a ghost or real?”
4. Test one ghost today. Break its power with a single action or by seeking evidence outside your recycled narrative.
5. Repeat, weekly, with the aim of separating ongoing myth from practice.
This approach insists on the analytic difference between identity-narratives—what capital and culture tell us about “who we are”—and material skill-building, the only lever for meaningful change. If you build infrastructure for others, model this habit as a cultural norm. Fold it into your organization’s onboarding, peer review, or mentorship process. Do not decorate the myth; puncture it.
What Is Self-Awareness Not?
Let’s clarify: self-awareness is not self-deprecation disguised as analysis, nor is it a practice of endless comparison. Observing your deficits without connection to concrete action is not virtue; it is procrastination. At the same time, lionizing your pain for social or cultural capital—making it the centerpiece of your creative narrative—remains a self-indulgent stasis.
The alternative is brutal, simple, liberatory: detach your study of skills from stories about struggle, and refuse the spectacle of pain as proof of value. Build where you are unfinished; call myths by their names; and set new defaults for both culture and craft.
Prompt for Radical Reflection
Which of your persistent internal or collective stories about creative work—suffering as value, genius as birthright, skill as mystique—serves power outside yourself or your community more than it serves your own development and agency? What would change if you refused to let that story decide the limits of your labor or your art?
Looking for tools and resources that help transform your midnset and bring you to your development? Visit The Creative Vault.
Leave a Reply