The Vacancy Mirage and Labor’s Future
Reports out of the Netherlands keep repeating a familiar refrain: workforce shortages, desperate employers, record open vacancies. Peel back the headline and a different story emerges—one calibrated for this moment of accelerated automation. The jobs calling out for bodies often belong to professions already in AI’s crosshairs: administrative staff, support desks, operational roles, clerical pipeline work. Leadership’s rallying cry to “fill the gaps” does not signal stability for those entrenched in roles that digital agents and process automations are poised to swallow whole.
Ignore this shift at your peril. Corporations, banks, hospital systems, care facilities—logically the last bastions for hands-on labor—now move quietly but decisively towards automating every repeatable process. They do it not for novelty but under the relentless arithmetic of cost-reduction and efficiency. The jobs that soak up time zones, perform high-volume but rote interactions, produce records nobody reads: these wither first.
AI, Data, and Power: Uncomfortable Arithmetic
The World Economic Forum said it openly: by 2030, any employer not building with AI at the core is building nothing. Employees must work with AI modules, design new workflows, or exit. Artists, founders, directors—those leading with creative solution based thinking—already grasp that AI’s appetite for data means every organization is swiftly becoming a data factory. Not gold, but data: harvested, monetized, fed into models that shape everything from funding cycles to the delivery of culture. The paradigm shift is not only who produces but who holds the power to profit from dataset economies.
Who is hiring? Look at the job boards. Project managers, product leaders—roles tasked with wrangling data, distilling trends, feeding the loop of product iteration and monetization. These jobs remain because they hold both a critical thinking edge and a proximity to organizational decision-making. They cannot be code-switched or scripted away; their job is to interpret the numbers, predict the human, secure the revenue stream. Anything under that bar—anything repetitive, predictable—faces erasure or export.
Outsourcing Human Contact: The Geography of Deskilling
Global wage arbitrage continues to redraw the boundaries of labor. When companies bother to “retain human interaction,” they simply shift support offices from high-cost economies to wherever labor is cheapest. Want real evidence? Try buying a Dutch-made T-shirt, or an American one. The production left years ago; only the story of prosperity remains. Western economies may wax poetic about “reshoring” and returning jobs, but logistical and wage realities erase those fantasies. For cultural leaders and artists, this means wrestling with infrastructure that will never again be local by default.
The delusion that AI and productivity gains purely empower ignores the core logic: every system designed for profit will relentlessly seek to deskill, automate, outsource. The window for those without adaptive mindset work is closing faster than most admit—with a brutal swiftness for anyone clinging to the routines of the 20th century. That’s not fear-mongering; that’s arithmetic.
Critical Preparation: Mindset Audits and Relentless Adaptation
The artist, founder, or director who hesitates—waiting for systems to stand still while they recalibrate—already lags. The productive question is not “if” the world changes, but which skills increase one’s competitive advantage in a system hellbent on both creative and economic consolidation. Waiting is a luxury past generations may have enjoyed at the onset of mass computing or mechanization. Today, refusal to audit mindset or resist shifting skillsets is less nostalgia and more abdication—a choice to exit relevancy by inertia.
It’s lazy, not for want of intelligence or curiosity, but for persisting in the myth that inherited routines retain value. You blink, and your labor’s context closes around you.
Practical Tool: The “Relocation Audit” Framework
Block one hour this week. List every skill or routine you offer—sectioned into “Automatable,” “Location-Transferable,” and “Interpretive/Creative.” Now, scan your nearest sector for live vacancies: what’s automating, what’s being offshored, what’s irreplaceable? Draft a minimum of two pathways to migrate your creative labor from “Automatable” to “Interpretive.” Treat this as an annual, not one-off, audit.
Critical creative solution based thinking starts from the facts—and demands structure, not comfort.
Question for Reflection
If a system rewards only those whose skills can’t be automated or outsourced, what structures or practices—old or new—stand between creative labor and disposability, and do you trust them to protect you?
Leave a Reply